Learning objects
April 2008
Ken Allan, The Correspondence School, Wellington, NZ
The full version of this paper is available to download in pdf format - see box below. On this page you'll find the paper's introduction.
Download pdf version of this paper help
You'll need Adobe Reader to open this file - you can download it for free from www.adobe.com
Learning objects discussion paper (pdf, 161KB)
Introduction
Have you ever learned how to activate a setting on a
The learning objects referred to here, and others like them, owe much of their success to one common aspect of their design: feedback that is relevant to the immediate circumstance of the learner - the hallmark of a good learning object. This discussion paper is about the learning object, its design, development and appropriate use as one of the many components in the portfolio of applied
Early last century simple mechanical devices were invented to help with learning. The 1960s saw computers assist with traditional learning methods such as face-to-face language instruction. A sophisticated blend of technology and
A device fitting some or all of these descriptors is broadly termed a digital learning object. It came into its own with the advent of the internet in 1992. Use of the fundamental principles behind learning objects has been raised to a level of maturity through the work of organisations such as MERLOT (Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching), a free and open resource involving a large online community in the development of learning objects for higher education hosted by the California State University System.
Comments jump to form
In the spirit of the paper, here are some points for discussion.
I'm not anti LO, but I try to think carefully about how they are used.
Let's prepare ourselves for 'Death by Learning Object', in much the same way as I'm sure that many of us can relate to the term 'Death by Powerpoint'.
I believe that LO's have a place in a well structured course, online or face-face-to-face provided that there is also scope for discssion, interaction. I predict that a course made up of LO's would not engage long enought to succeed.
Put simply, I can recall the blank look on my student's faces when I asked them to get onto their 2nd Scorm module in 1 session - never again. How many LO's can you study in 1 go: 1? 1 1/4? 1 1/2? Any number less than 2?
Also, there is the issue of context - invariably, attractive engaging LOs created for one context (usually from one funding stream) oftne do nto quite meet the needs of a different teaching context.
There's always the self contained nature - LOs can miss the opportunity to build on existing knowledge since they are 'forbidden' from linking to that knowledge.
There are tools available which will allow practitioners to turn simple content (text, images) into LOs and to add navigation and some assessment (quizzes). However, the creation of the sophisticatedmultimedia one might expect in engaging LOs is a serious, expensive, professional business, outside the range of most practitioners.
I agree with Diament and bring to mind Death by Chocolate. A poor chef includes chocolate as an ingredient in every dish but it is a shortsighted one who excludes its use altogether. If the only recipe available that includes it is a mediocre one then chocolate should be off the menu. A good chef chooses recipes wisely.